Finishing the multi stage modulation envelope

[exonerate]

Is there any reason why you cant yust replace the 1st (stage 0) comparison by a constant1

Yes because all the bit's need setting to 1. There is no constant that will do this for floats.

[infuzion]

Sorry, what I meant was that your version uses more! Guess I didn't word that very well.

Hmm, that is weird, I can see the Manager's optimization backfiring, but it is very very rare that a reduction of 4+ cycles in a dual-core ends up being something to makes things worse in single-core... are you sure you calibrated the CPU Cycle Analysers & turned them off & on.? There is a bug in those that the after you load they are not really running when the switch says it is on. I thought I fixed it in v1.6, but didn't. Also, sometimes you have to swap wires around also to get a better idea of a real reading also.

I'd like to hear others' CPU% test results w/CPUs models please.
edit: Attached is included with v1.7 of the fixed CPU Cycle Analyser with a fixed run on load if on.

[exonerate]

Sorry, what I meant was that your version uses more! Guess I didn't word that very well.

Hmm, that is weird, I can see the Manager's optimization backfiring, but it is very very rare that a reduction of 4+ cycles in a dual-core ends up being something to makes things worse in single-core... are you sure you calibrated the CPU Cycle Analysers & turned them off & on.? There is a bug in those that the after you load they are not really running when the switch says it is on. I thought I fixed it in v1.6, but didn't. Also, sometimes you have to swap wires around also to get a better idea of a real reading also.

I'd like to hear others' CPU% test results w/CPUs models please.
edit: Attached is included with v1.7 of the fixed CPU Cycle Analyser with a fixed run on load if on.

Yeah it's still the same.

By the way my CPU is a dual core it's an old pentium D based on the pentium 4.

[MegaHurtz]

the results on my P3 are quite good.. May I ask what changed in the newer version Analiser??

[infuzion]

the results on my P3 are quite good.. May I ask what changed in the newer version Analiser??

How much faster/slower is my version compared to Exo's please?
I forgot to add a release note for the analyzer, now I have.

[trogluddite]

the results on my P3

Respect - that's true dedication to beta testing

[Large]

Exonerate,

I still hear popping with the envelope.

How do I fix this OSM?

[infuzion]

I still hear popping with the envelope.
How do I fix this OSM?

http://www.synthmaker.co.uk/dokuwiki/do ... _of_clicks

[Large]

This is more complex than "clicks", infuzion.

There is a second popping sine wave when the HARMONIC value is RAISED.

Download the OSM and see if you can fix it.

Thanks in advance.

[Large]

Can someone fix this envelope, as long release times seem to make the pop longer as well?

[infuzion]

There is a second popping sine wave when the HARMONIC value is RAISED.

OUCH MY EARS!! I wasn't expecting loud test tones!
I honestly can't hear the second popping. I am using cheap sound card & speakers though.
I'll need a spectrogram or whatever in the OSM to visually see the 2nd pop I guess.

[Large]

Sorry

But use spectral analysis and you'll see two sines.

Shortening the release shortens the lower pitched sine (which shouldn't be there at all).

[attic]

I noticed that to and would like to see this very useful project updated. Unfortunately I don't think my SM chops are up to it
so it will have to be someone else. Any takers?

[Large]

Well, Exonerate was the lead developer. But he seems to have vanished.

We need to get him back. Clearly this envelope is not ready; see what it does to my two OSMs above.

[infuzion]

I wouldn't mind helping out real fast, but I need a quick OSM test than I can open & see what is wrong in 5 seconds. To me, I don't see any issues right now, but I may be missing something.